Legal Opinion
Julie Arcand v. Catalyst Brands LLC
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided February 10, 2026No. 2:25-cv-01445Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 JULIE ARCAND, CASE NO. 2:25-cv-01445-DGE 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 12 v. MOTION TO STAY ACTION PENDING RESOLUTION OF 13 CATALYST BRANDS LLC, APPEALS IN RELATED MATTERS (DKT. NO. 13) 14 Defendants. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ motion to stay action pending 17 resolution of appeals in related matters. (Dkt. No. 13.) Having considered the motion, Plaintiff’s 18 response in opposition (Dkt. No. 17), and Defendants’ reply in support (Dkt. No. 27), the Court 19 GRANTS IN…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Antonio R. Leyva v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.