Albritton v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
BURDOCK, Justice.
In appellant’s motion for rehearing, he takes issue with our holding in one ground of error. Appellant suggests that a conviction for speeding alone is insufficient to sustain an order revoking appellant’s probation.
The opinion issued by this court, 676 S.W.2d 717, in overruling appellant’s original third ground of error relies exclusively on the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion in Marshall v. State, 466 S.W.2d 582 (Tex.Crim.App.1971). We are informed by appellant that this is in conflict with Steed v. State, 467 S.W.2d 460…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Steed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Albritton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nam Hoai Le v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- State v. SheehanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Brian Valentine v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
- Charles Tuncle v. Roosevelt Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
- Steve Kotlarich v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003