Legal Opinion

United States v. Certain Land in Falls TP.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 4, 1930No. 5860PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

The situation presented by this motion is an unusual one. The fact basis of the complaint made is that possession of the lands of the petitioners was taken from them by the strong military arm of the government, backed by the power of eminent domain; that the only justification for the taking was that the lands were needed for military use; that the lawful exercise of the power of eminent domain is limited to the purposes of this use, so that the title acquired thereby ends with such use, hut, notwithstanding this, the United States asserts a fee-simple title to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Phillips v. NegleySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. United States v. WallaceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1891
  3. Thomas v. American Freehold Land & Mortgage Co. of London, Ltd.U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1891
  4. Brown v. AllebachU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Condemnation by the CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Cope v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API