Legal Opinion · Dissent

Koehne v. Harvey

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1946No. 294Published

1DissentHood, Associate Judge

I cannot agree that Harvey was landlord of Koehne and therefore cannot agree that Harvey was entitled to maintain the action. Koehne’s tenancy commenced under his lease from Fisher and Company. When the property was conveyed to the new owners they became Koehne’s landlords with the same rights as the former landlord. Code 1940, § 45 — 932; Bailey v. Allan E. Walker & Co., Inc., 53 App. D.C. 307, 290 F. 282; Selden v. Lee, 55 App.D.C. 164, 3 F.2d 335. No attornment by Koehne to the new owners was necessary. Code 1940, § 45—933. Thus, the relationship of landlord and tenant was created between…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Bailey v. Allen E. Walker & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1923
  3. Tebbs v. Union Realty Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1923
  4. Selden v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API