Legal Opinion
In re R.M., R.M., and C.M.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided August 30, 2013No. 2013-86PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Following a permanency review hearing, the superior court, family division amended its initial disposition order from a goal of reunification to a concurrent plan for either reunification or adoption. Mother appealed, claiming that the court erred in modifying the disposition order and finding that a reasonable period of time for her to complete needed services under the new plan was six months. While the appeal was pending, we requested supplemental briefing on whether the order in question is an appealable final order. We now conclude that it is and affirm the judgment.
¶ 2. The three…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re R.W. and N.W.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- In Re Burlington Bagel Bakery, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- In re A.G.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- In re L.S. & K.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- In re D.G.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re I.B., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- In Re Z.P., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
- In re C.P. & L.P., JuvenilesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019