Legal Opinion

United States v. Loftis

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided July 11, 1882PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Information for Violation of Section 3893 of the Eevisod Statutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Deady, D. J.

The defendant is accused by the information in this case of “the crime of depositing for mailing and delivery in the post-office of the Unitéd States a publication of an indecent character, and a letter containing indecent and scurrilous epithets, contrary to section 3893 of the Eevised Statutes, committed by knowingly mailing at Rainier, in a sealed envelope, postage paid, and addressed to £ Mr. Joish Way Thayer, Oregon City, Oregon,’ a certain Obscene and indecent writing and publication” in words and figures as herein set forth.

The defendant demurs to the information because it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Jacob Hoffmann Brewing Co. v. McElligottDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1919
  3. United States v. BaumgartnerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1919
  4. United States v. ChaseU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1886
  5. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API