Legal Opinion
Soto v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 31, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County *450(Bertram Katz, J.), entered September 27, 1999, which, upon reargument, granted defendant’s motion to set aside the jury verdict only to the extent of setting aside the verdict as to liability and ordering a new trial thereon, leaving the verdict as to damages intact, unanimously modified, on the law, to direct that the judgment, same court and Justice, entered June 1, 1999 upon said jury verdict, entitling plaintiff to recover from defendant the total amount of $298,260, be vacated, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeal from the aforesaid judgment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Woodson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Garcia v. SpiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Cohen v. Interlaken Owners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Martinez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by5 opinions
- Singh v. Young Manor, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Davis v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Davis v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Griffin v. Clinton Green South, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Griffin v. Clinton Green South, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012