Legal Opinion

Dunnigan v. Friedman

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided September 12, 1947Published

1Opinion of the CourtLoreto, J.

The validity of a personal judgment entered on April 10, 1934, in this summary proceeding is attacked by the defendant’s motion for an order vacating it. Several grounds are urged.

The first, that the petition was not verified, is overruled. The tenant, having .answered and appeared on the trial, will be deemed to have waived this defect. (Cerama Apartments Corporations v. Solomon, 150 Misc. 906.)

The next ground urged is that the trial justice failed to make any determination allowing a money judgment, which was improperly entered by the clerk of the court. This point is well taken.

The only…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cerana Apartments Corp. v. SolomonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API