Legal Opinion

Aymar v. Chace

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1851PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from an order made by a single judge at chambers, denying a motion on the part of the defendant for judgment, on the ground that the plaintiff had not replied to the answer.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Edmonds, P. J.

In this case, a motion was made at chambers, for judgment for the defendant in the suit, because the plaintiff had not replied to the answer. The motion was denied, and from the order denying it, an appeal was taken.

That order was right. There is but one cape in which a judge *302at chambers can grant a judgment, and that is under § 247 of the code, where if a demurrer, answer or reply be frivolous, the party prejudiced thereby may apply to a judge, either in or out of court, for judgment thereon, and judgment may be given accordingly. In all other cases, judgment can…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re BookhoutNew York Supreme Court · 1856

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API