United States v. $12,248 U.S. Currency, and Jack Johnson, Claimant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentFarris, Circuit Judge
The majority’s opinion focuses on what it calls the government’s “poor investigation” and “unreasonable delay.” Because I believe the government adequately demonstrated a reasonable justification for its actions, I "respectfully dissent.
The Equal Access to Justice Act seeks to punjsh unreasonable government behavior without impairing the government’s.ability to effectively and efficiently enforce the nation’s, laws. United States v. B & M Used Cars, 860 F.2d 121, 124 (4th Cir.1988). The government must pass the four part test established by the Supreme Court: 1) length of delay; 2) reason for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- George L. Barry v. Otis R. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Ivers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. One 1985 Chevrolet CorvetteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.