Legal Opinion

Vulcan Power Co. v. Bonneville Power Administration

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 16, 1996No. 94-70748PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Vulcan Power Company, an unsuccessful bidder for a federal Geothermal Pilot Project at the Newberry Crater in Oregon (the “Project”), appeals two final decisions of the respondent, Bonneville Power Administration (“Bonneville”). On September 15, 1994, Bonneville decided not to reopen the Project selection and affirmed its initial decision not to select Vulcan. Bonneville’s second decision, dated September 16, 1994 was to execute a Power Purchase Agreement with the successful bidder, intervenor C.E. Newberry, Inc. (“Newberry”), a subsidiary of intervenor California Energy Company, Inc.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northwest Motorcycle Ass'n v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Aluminum Co. of America v. Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Utility Reform Project v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 41 cont.cas.fed. (Cch) P 76,978, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5244, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8478 Vulcan Power Company v. Bonneville Power Administration, California Energy Company, Inc. C.E. Newberry, Inc., Respondents-IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API