United States v. Daniel Clifford Whittenburg
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
The appellant was indicted and tried for failing to submit to induction under the Selective Service Act, 50 U.S.C.App. § 462(a). He was tried to the court, found guilty, and sentenced.
Appellant asserts that the trial court was in error in refusing to grant a motion for acquittal on the ground that appellant was not afforded the opportunity to submit to induction. Error is also urged as to the test applied on intent, and the proof as to wilfulness.
The record shows that appellant reported at the induction center on the day ordered. On arrival he asked to see a psychiatrist,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- David W. Wion v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- William Chernekoff, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- John Thomas Fitts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. Robert Thomas Ebey, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Ronald R. MechamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Donald F. Bettenhausen and Bernice A. BettenhausenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974