Magbee v. Federal Express
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGremillion, Judge
hi dissent from the majority’s opinion only on assignments of error two and six.
Assignment of error two:
In assignment of error two, Magbee complains that the WCJ refused to authorize the MRI of his left knee. The WCJ noted that Magbee fell onto his buttocks and back and wondered how his left knee could have been injured in the fall. The WCJ also noted that during the course of treating Magbee’s left knee, Dr. Cobb noted no objective findings, Magbee reported subjectively that the knee grew less pain*1063ful over time, and Dr. Cobb stopped requesting the MRI after a time.
Magbee suggested that Dr.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
- Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Sharbono v. Steve Lang & Son LoggersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Langley v. Petro Star Corp. of La.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.