Dougherty v. Henarie
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. This case was reported in the 47 Cal., p. 10, where the facts are stated. The petition for a rehearing had been mislaid, and the records of the Court failing to show that an application for a rehearing was pending, the case was reported. The opinion on the petition for rehearing is now. published for the benefit of counsel.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court :
By some accident the petition for a rehearing in this case was not brought to our attention until recently. The point relied upon in the petition is, that the tax-deed to Meyers does not contain the necessary recitals. But this point was not raised at the argument, and no objection to the deed on this ground has been urged, except in the petition for a rehearing. In the opinion, we assumed that the deed contained the proper recitals, because nothing had been alleged to the contrary, and no point of that kind was raised. The sufficiency of the deed, in this particular, not having…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Traders Etc. Ins. Co. v. Pac. Emp. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Traders & General Insurance v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Powell v. Nevada, California & Oregon RailwayNevada Supreme Court · 1905
- Copper Queen Mining Co. v. Arizona Prince Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1886
- Wundenberg v. CampbellHawaii Supreme Court · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.