Legal Opinion
General Teamsters Local No. 231 v. Whatcom County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 24, 1984No. 11735-1-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.
General Teamsters Local 231 (Union) appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Whatcom County, ruling that a labor dispute between the County and the Union is not subject to arbitration under a collective bargaining agreement. We reverse.
On July 22, 1981, after 2 years of negotiations, the Union and the County entered into a collective bargaining agreement, incorporating a comprehensive classification plan evaluating and ranking the jobs of County employees. Darlene Anderson, a Union member employed in the County Treasurer's Office, was classified as a Clerk III in the agreement.
On August…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Independent Petroleum Workers of America, Inc. v. American Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Local Union No. 77 v. Public Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Mount Adams School District v. CookWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Yakima County Law Enforcement Officers Guild v. Yakima CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Spokane School District No. 81 v. Spokane Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Mount Adams School Dist. v. CookWashington Supreme Court · 2003