Legal Opinion

Morse v. Rice

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1893No. 4785PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from the district court of Merrick county. Tried below before Marshall, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

On the 11th day of January, 1890, defendant in error brought his action in the district court to recover the sum of four thousand dollars and interest upon two certificates of deposit, executed by plaintiff in error for the sum of $2,000 each, dated respectively January 25, 1888, and February 3, 1888. The certificates are alike except as to dates and numbers, and in words and figures following:

“$2,000. Clarks, Neb., January 25th, 1888. No. 2089.
“ W. H. C. Rice has deposited with W. R. Morse, banker, two thousand dollars, payable to the order of himself in current funds on the return of this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coon v. . KnapNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. American Bridge Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  3. Smith v. SchulenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Morris v. St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  5. Michigan Central Railroad v. DunhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sylvester v. Carpenter Paper Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Bell v. RiceNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Hockenberger v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Waters v. PhelpsNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Jewett v. McGillicuddyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API