Legal Opinion

Briant v. Reed

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1862PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On motion to dissolve the injunction issued in this cause 'under the circumstances stated in the Chancellor's opinion—

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

On the fourth of September, 1861, the complainants, Briant and Atno, gave tlioir promissory note for $540.80, payable to A. B. Jennings, or order, at the Iron Bank, in six months from date. In October, 1861, the money owing upon said note was attached in the hands of the makers, by virtue of a writ of attachment, issued out of the Morris Circuit, at the suit of A. and F. Reed. The suit is still pending, auditors having been appointed to audit and adjust the demands of the plaintiffs and of the other applying creditors. On the twenty-seventh of February, 1862, Andrew Lemassena…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shaw v. CosterNew York Court of Chancery · 1840

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Republic Casualty Co. v. FischmannNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  2. Police, C., Township of Teaneck v. SgangaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API