Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Ashlcmd County. Action to recover damages for the diversion and discharge of surface waters upon the premises of the plaintiff. The facts will sufficiently appear from the opinion. There was a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, assessing his damages at $500, and from the judgment thereon the defendant appeals.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Ashlcmd County. Action to recover damages for the diversion and discharge of surface waters upon the premises of the plaintiff. The facts will sufficiently appear from the opinion. There was a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, assessing his damages at $500, and from the judgment thereon the defendant appeals. They cited, besides cases cited in the opinion, Heth v. Fond 'dm, Lae, 68 Wis. 228; Turner v. Dartmouth, 13' Allen, 291; Barry v. Lowell, 8 id. 127; Dickinson v. Worcester, 7 id. 19; Flagg v. Worcester, 13 Gray, 601; Parks r. Tfewhuryport, 10 id. 28;…

1Opinion of the CourtOetoN, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff to recover damages of the defendant company for diverting surface water running across its lands to and over the premises of the plaintiff. The railway track of the defendant runs east and west along the center of Fourth street of the city of Ashland, and the street is 'bbtwpen blocks 28 and 29 on the north and blocks 47 and 48 on the south; and the defendant also owns the north half of said last-mentioned blocks, on which it has three side tracks, leaving the main track west of said blocks and running southeast. The premises of the plaintiff are lot 11…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. City of HudsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Hanlin v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Allen v. City of Chippewa FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  4. O'Connor v. Fond du Lac, Amboy & Peoria Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Fryer v. WarneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Manteufel v. WetzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Shaw v. WardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Champion v. Town of CrandonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Franklin v. DurgeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API