Legal Opinion

Morris v. Morris

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1894PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Clarh Circuit Court. — Hon. Ben. E. Tuenee, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombaueb, P. J.

The trial court granted to the plaintiff a divorce upon his petition, which set out a proper statutory ground for such relief, and which was in other respects sufficient in law. The defendant was personally served in the action more than thirty days before the beginning of the term, but failed to appear. The plaintiff thereupon adduced evidence sufficient to entitle him to a decree. Subsequently, but at the same term, the court vacated the decree of divorce of its own motion, and the plaintiff appeals and complains that such action of the court was unwarranted.

In vacating the decree, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Owen v. OwenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Nelson v. GhiselinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Moore v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Willis v. WillisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Savings Trust Co. of St. Louis v. SkainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  3. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. In Re Adoption of Zartman v. AlfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. Dunn v. DunnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API