Legal Opinion · Dissent

New York Life Ins. v. Miller

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 30, 1943No. 10258Published

1DissentHaney, Circuit Judge

The only vital issue in this case is whether or not the premiums on the policies had been paid. It is asserted, and the majority hold, that the post-dated check could be treated as payment. Such a holding appears to me to have little, if any foundation in reason or in fact.

The question as to whether delivery of a check constitutes payment of a premium is treated in an annotation in 40 A.L.R. 419, 423, where it is said: “The general rule appears to be that the mere receipt of a check will not prevent a forfeiture of the policy for non-payment of premium, but if the check is accepted as payment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seaman v. MuirOregon Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API