Legal Opinion

Rehr v. Trumbull Lumber Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1924No. 18213PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The rights and responsibilities of the parties grew out of the written proposal of the Trumbull Lumber Company, accepted by the manager of the Warren Cartage & Coal Company, which constitutes the contract, so far as a contract was executed, for the sale of certain timber therein described by the lumber company to the cartage and coal company. Following the invoice therein it was stated as follows:

"Price quoted is for material f. o. b. cars your siding.. It is mutually understood and agreed that you are to make a payment of $1470.00 to us upon the arrival of these timbers. * * * It is further…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pridmore v. Puffer Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Val Decker Packing Co. v. Armour & Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1960
  2. Lakeside Truck Rental, Inc. v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API