Legal Opinion
Bailleaux v. Cupp
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 11, 1974No. 79460PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
Petitioner, contending that he was unlawfully-deprived of the status of a parolee by the Oregon State Board of Parole and Probation, brought this habeas corpus proceeding. He appeals from an adverse decision by the circuit court.
ORS 34.710 provides for an appeal in a habeas corpus proceeding as follows:
“Any party to a proceeding by habeas corpus, including the state when the district attorney appears therein, may appeal from the judgment of the court refusing to allow such writ or any final judgment therein, either in term time or vacation, in ldm manner and with like effect as in an action.
In…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States Ex Rel. John Bey v. Connecticut State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- In Re PrewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Smallman v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Russell L. O'Bremski v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Harris v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Priest v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Addicks v. State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- O'NEAL v. NJ State Parole BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.