Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barry v. Brittain

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 10, 1954No. 5-413Published

1DissentJ. Seaborn Holt, J.

The decisive question presented is primarily not whether Mrs. Brittain’s husband owed her the duty to support her, but whether, under the following plain and unambiguous provision of her will, — “I direct that all just debts which I may owe, including the expenses of my last illness and of my burial, be paid,” — created a charge upon Mrs. Brittain’s separate property that imposed ultimate liability on her estate. It seems obvious to me that it did.

The uniform rule is that courts must construe and enforce wills as written. Mrs. Brittain, whatever her motive, had a right to dispose of her…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. Park v. HollomanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  3. Morris v. DoschSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  4. Quattlebaum v. the Simmons National Bank, Admr.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  5. Farver v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API