Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Douglas J. Finkle, Sr.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 19, 2018No. 2017-313Published

1DissentSkoglund, J.

¶ 30. Because I find the confidential informant's (CI's) statements fail to satisfy the legal standard of credibility or reliability, and because I find the affiant officer neither credible nor reliable, I would hold that the search warrant was not supported by probable cause and grant defendant's motion to suppress the challenged evidence.

¶ 31. As the majority explained above, when the finding of probable cause is based upon hearsay incorporated into an affidavit, we apply the two-pronged test from Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 114-15, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964), and Spinelli v.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API