Legal Opinion

Redford v. Boutte

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1994No. 93-1409PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

jiPER CURIAM.

Cornell Redford, appeals a jury verdict on the grounds that it improperly allocated 75% *703fault to him and awarded him inadequate damages. We affirm.

FACTS

On April 3, 1991, between 7:30 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. the vehicles driven by Mr. Redford and the defendant, Hugo Boutte, collided at an intersection located in Lafayette, Louisiana known as the Southeast Evangeline Thruway and University Avenue. The intersection consists of fourteen lanes of travel. This intersection is controlled by a myriad of traffic lights. On the date of the accident, the traffic light was not working. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  3. Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  4. Socorro v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  5. Kibbe v. LegeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Adkinson v. Brookshire Grocery Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API