Legal Opinion
City of Bayonne v. Palmer
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 29, 1966PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered
2Per curiam
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Matthews in the Superior Court, Chancery Division. City of Bayonne v. Palmer, 90 N. J. Super. 245 (Ch. Div. 1966).
I
On this appeal plaintiffs renew their charge that the contracts between the Commissioner of the State Highway De partment and the railroads are violative of Article VIII, § III, par. 3 of the State Constitution. More specifically they assert that payment by the State of any moneys called for under the contracts (details of which are outlined in the opinion below, 90 N.…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Southern Railway Co. v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
4Cited by20 opinions
- Paul Kimball Hospital, Inc. v. Brick Township Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- NJ Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCraneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Inganamort v. Bor. of Fort LeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. GlaserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Meadowlands Reg. Dev. Agency v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.