Legal Opinion

Heath v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 1, 2004No. A02A1604PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

In State v. Heath, 1 our Supreme Court, in its review of this ineffective assistance of counsel claim arising out of a guilty plea in a criminal conviction, held that we had erred in presuming prejudice to the defendant based on the lack of representation provided by his attorney. It held that the facts of this case required a showing of prejudice. In its limited ruling, the Supreme Court reversed our holding 2 that Heath’s legal representation was so lacking, that he was entitled to a presumption of prejudice, and remanded the case to this court for consideration…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pattillo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Stapp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Gresham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Cleveland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  5. Cleveland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API