Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Hutchins

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided June 26, 2013No. 12-0408/MCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1ConcurrenceRyan, Judge

This case presents the very close question whether, under the circumstances, the Naval Criminal Investigative Service’s (NCIS) request for consent to search Appellant’s personal belongings constituted a reinitiation of interrogation under Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981), and, therefore, a violation of Appellant’s Fifth Amendment right to not incriminate himself. It is clear that a mere request for a permissive search authorization is not itself an interrogation, see United States v. Frazier, 34 M.J. 135, 137 (C.M.A.1992) (“A request for a consent to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. HutchinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API