Taylor v. Rawls

COMBS, Justice.

The judgment is for $1150 for damages to and loss of use of plaintiff’s automobile which was struck by another automobile while it was parked on the street.

The only question raised on the appeal is whether the pleading and proof are sufficient to warrant a judgment against appellant under the Family Purpose Doctrine.

It is not alleged in the petition that defendant’s automobile was being operated *51by him at the fime of the accident. The only allegation on this point is that the vehicle was being operated by “a member of defendant’s family.” The sufficiency of the petition was…