Legal Opinion

Bank of Am. v. Carlson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 17, 2019No. A162895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, P. J.

*506In U.S. Bank National Assn. v. McCoy , 290 Or. App. 525, 527, 415 P.3d 1116 (2018), a judicial foreclosure action like this one, we held that a statement in a bank employee's declaration, attesting that the bank's business records showed that the defendant's promissory note had been in the plaintiff's possession at the time it commenced foreclosure proceedings, was inadmissible to establish the plaintiff's standing to enforce the note. We concluded that, even though the bank records themselves were admissible under the hearsay exception for business records, the statement as to what those…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Churchill v. MeadeOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. VettrusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Providence Health & Services-Oregon v. MancusoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API