Legal Opinion

Kaitz v. Pergola

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 10, 1997Published

1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, J.

This is an action by plaintiffs John and Steven S. Kaitz (“the Trustees”) on a promissory note (“the Note”) executed by defendants Philip and Susan R. Pergola (“the Pergolas”). Pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A D. A, Rule 8A the Trustees have appealed the allowance of summary judgment in favor of the Pergolas on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment.

In January, 1988, the Pergolas purchased a residence from one Gesner in exchange for their Note and a mortgage on the property securing the Note. In July, 1989, Gesner assigned the Note and mortgage to the Trustees to secure a debt Gesner…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Madsen v. ErwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Stetson v. Board of Selectmen of CarlisleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Whitney v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Webster Thomas Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  5. Baptiste v. Sheriff of Bristol CountyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API