Kaitz v. Pergola
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, J.
This is an action by plaintiffs John and Steven S. Kaitz (“the Trustees”) on a promissory note (“the Note”) executed by defendants Philip and Susan R. Pergola (“the Pergolas”). Pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A D. A, Rule 8A the Trustees have appealed the allowance of summary judgment in favor of the Pergolas on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment.
In January, 1988, the Pergolas purchased a residence from one Gesner in exchange for their Note and a mortgage on the property securing the Note. In July, 1989, Gesner assigned the Note and mortgage to the Trustees to secure a debt Gesner…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Madsen v. ErwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Stetson v. Board of Selectmen of CarlisleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Whitney v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Webster Thomas Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Baptiste v. Sheriff of Bristol CountyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.