Legal Opinion

Curd v. HB Zachry Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1963No. 7005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARMODY, Justice.

Defendant (who is the appellant here) seeks a reversal of the judgment awarded in favor of the plaintiff below by reason of injuries grounded on negligence.

The facts found by the trial court are not controverted by the parties, and we recognize them to be the facts on the appeal, even though a great many of them are evidentiary as distinguished from ultimate findings of fact. The trial court adopted, as its own, all of the plaintiff’s requested findings and, in addition, some twenty-five out of thirty-three of the defendant’s requests, with no apparent effort to make its own…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rosier v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Myers v. SandersMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Commonwealth Department of Highways v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
  4. Hadaway v. Lone Star Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Hanson v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Koenig v. PerezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Jones v. New Mexico School of MinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Abeita v. Northern Rio Arriba Electric CooperativeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Abeita v. Northern Rio Arriba Electric CooperativeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Jones v. New Mexico School of MinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API