Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Champlin Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garfield County; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by the Champlin Lumber Company against the Chicago, Eock Island & Pacific Eailway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, C. J.
This was an action commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, for the purpose of recovering alleged overcharges on certain shipments of lumber in carload lots. Upon the plaintiff resting his case, both parties moved the court for a directed verdict, whereupon the court sustained the motion of the plaintiff, and, in accordance with the direction of the court, the jury returned a verdict in its favor in the sum of $580.70, to reverse which action this proceeding in error was commenced. •
The grounds upon which plaintiff in error seeks a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Griffin v. Wabash RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Sloop v. Wabash RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
3Cited by1 opinion
- St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. McNabbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916