Legal Opinion
Goldman v. First National Bank
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 22, 1972No. 71 C 1653PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BAUER, District Judge.
This cause comes on defendant’s motion to disallow the maintenance of the instant action as a class action pursuant to Rule 23(c) (1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
When plaintiff Steven Goldman (“Goldman”) opened an open end consumer credit account under defendant’s BANKAMERICARD plan, defendant was required, by reason of section 127 of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1637, to make a number of disclosures. In a two count complaint, Goldman alleges defendant did not “clearly and conspicuously” make certain of these required…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ratner v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Kenney v. Landis Financial Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1972
- Shields v. Valley National BankDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1971
- Zachary v. Chase Manhattan BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
3Cited by31 opinions
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Robert La Mar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Company, Ronald J. Kinsling v. Allegheny AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,173 Michael Susman v. Lincoln American Corp., Ann Flamm and Arnold Flamm v. Rudolph Eberstadt, Jr. And Microdot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Robertson v. National Basketball AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Marie Wilcox, Appellants-Plaintiffs v. Commerce Bank of Kansas City, a Corporation, Appellee-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.