Legal Opinion

City of Montgomery v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 23, 1983No. 81-1016PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal by the defendants, City of Montgomery and Emory Folmar, from a declaratory judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. We affirm.

Plaintiff Robinson suffered a heart attack on June 28, 1980, while on duty as a fireman employed by the City of Montgomery. Following hospitalization and treatment, Robinson's physicians notified the City that Robinson was "100% permanently disabled as a firefighter." Thereafter Robinson requested of the City benefits under Act No. 26, Acts of 1962, commonly referred to as the "Trinity Act," and also under Act No. 565, Acts of 1975. Robinson's request was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. Tuscaloosa Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Heck v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Champion v. McLeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Ex Parte JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Connor v. State on Information of BoutwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. CantrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Robinson v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Saulsberry v. Wilcox County Bd. of Educ.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. Stallworth v. Board of School CommissionersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Smartt v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API