Ala. Midland Railway Co. v. Newton
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Probate Court of Montgomery. Heard before the Hon. F. O. Randolph.
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
— The pleadings show that prior to December 16, 1889, appellant began in the Probate Court of Mont*444gomery county ad quod damnum proceedings to condemn certain lands of appellee, to be used as a right of way; and on the 16th Décember, 1889, the day to which the hearing had been continued, the damages were assessed by a jury at $560, and the order of condemnation regularly entered by the court. Appellant did not pay the damages found by the jury, or take possession of the land condemned, or prosecute the condemnation proceedings further. In December, 1890, more than six months after the order of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- North Missouri Railroad v. LacklandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
- Schreiber v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- Stacey v. Vermont Central RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
- Graff v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
- Leisse v. St. Louis & Iron Mountain RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Alabama Power Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Haig v. Wateree Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- State v. PettisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Calhoun County v. LoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.