Clark v. Schwartz
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
McMurray, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff Schwartz originally filed this action seeking an account ing following the dissolution of an alleged partnership for the practice of law. Defendants Clark & Smith, P. C., Emory L. Clark and Hoke Smith III denied that they had ever been in a partnership with plaintiff. The original complaint was replaced in toto by an amended complaint which stated an action for damages and sought to recover the value of plaintiff Schwartz’s interest in the alleged partnership. Upon the trial of the case, a jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the amount of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Huggins v. HugginsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Reichard v. ReichardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Sierra Associates, Ltd. v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
3Cited by10 opinions
- TranSouth Financial Corp. v. RooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Lifestyle Family, L.P. v. Lawyers Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Antoskow & Associates, LLC v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Waugh v. WaughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.