Alvarado v. Lodge at the Bluffs, LLC
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentCrain, J.
|tAs correctly noted by the majority, an innkeeper must conduct reasonable inspections of his premises. However, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that mere presence for periodic cleaning of the subject condominium unit is sufficient to satisfy the duty to discover defects in the vanity stool. The evidence established that the staff simply cleaned the unit between visits. Under these factual circumstances, the majority’s conclusion is the equivalent of having paying guests rent the unit at their own risk. The duty of an innkeeper requires more.
The cases relied upon by the majority are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ferry v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Valley Securities Co. v. BrazierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Ross v. La Coste De MontervilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Alford v. Home Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Bush v. XYZ Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.