Legal Opinion

Stewart v. St. Louis County

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1981No. 44053PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

We reverse a declaratory judgment that “public funds” in § 210.160, RSMo. 1978 means “state funds.” The relevant parts of the statute provide:

In every case involving an abused or neglected child which results in a judicial proceeding the judge shall appoint a guardian ad litem to appear for and represent:(1) A child who is the subject of proceedings under Sections 210.110 to 210-165 [i.e., the child abuse and neglect reporting act];

* * * * ⅜ *

Said guardian ad litem may be allowed a reasonable fee for such services to be set by the court and paid from public funds. (emphasis added)

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Interest of RayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. St. Louis Police Relief Ass'n v. IgoeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. Hannibal Trust Co. v. ElzeaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  4. In Interest of RSPMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. State, Department of Social Services, Family Support Division v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. In the Interest of C.D.S. v. Missouri Division of Family ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Gross v. Jackson CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Siedhoff v. VajdaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API