Legal Opinion
The People of the Territory of Guam v. Edmund J. Olsen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 1976No. 76-1557PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In Agana Bay Development Co. v. Supreme Court of Guam, 529 F.2d 952 (9th Cir. 1976), a divided panel of this court held that the Organic Act of Guam, 64 Stat. 384 (1950), authorized the territory to enact its Court Reorganization Act, by which it transferred the appellate jurisdiction of the district court to the newly created Supreme Court of Guam. The record in that case shows that it was settled after our opinion issued; no petition for certiorari was filed with the Supreme Court of the United States.
Appellant in the present case was convicted of criminal charges in the Superior…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Agana Bay Development Company (Hong Kong) Ltd. v. Supreme Court of Guam, Dillingham Corporation of the Pacific, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
4Cited by8 opinions
- Territory of Guam v. OlsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Estefania Reyes Sablan, Nicolas Blas Reyes, Juliana Reyes Lizama, Francisco Blas Reyes, Rosa Reyes Agulto v. Rita Reyes SantosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- People of Territory of Guam v. OlsenDistrict Court, D. Guam · 1978
- Mailloux v. MaillouxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Eleanor F. Mailloux v. Gordon E. Mailloux and Marianas Pacific, Inc., and Chase Manhattan Bank (National Association), South Acres Development Co., a Partnership v. Chase Manhattan Bank (National Association)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.