Legal Opinion

State v. Black

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1995PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

The defendants, Hoyte R. Black, Jr. and Robert E. Hamborg, Sr., appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeals’ affirmance of the lower courts’ refusal to waive the defendants’ liability for court costs incurred in their prosecutions for driving under the influence (DUI). This case presents two issues for our determination: (1) whether a General Sessions court is authorized to waive a DUI defendant’s court costs upon a finding that the defendant is indigent; and (2) assuming that the General Sessions court is so authorized, whether the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. McClintockTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Watts v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Douglas v. Estate of RobertsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. HodgesTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Scott v. Ashland Healthcare Center, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. CAO Holdings, Inc. v. TrostTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. PerryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  5. Thomas v. HaslamDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API