Legal Opinion
Moore v. Gordon
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 8, 1938No. 3275PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’QUINN, Justice.
This was a suit by appellant Moore against appellee Gordon for specific performance of a certain contract entered into between Moore as first party and Gordon as second party, and praying in the alter native for damages in the event he should not be entitled to have the contract specifically performed.
The Orange National Bank was made a party defendant, it being alleged that said bank was designated as the escrow agent in the contract which appellant was seeking to have specifically performed.
We shall refer to the parties, Moore as plaintiff, and Gordon as defendant, that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Christopher v. City of El PasoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Owens v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- City of Beaumont v. Matthew Cartwright Land & Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Clement v. City of ParisTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- City of Fort Worth v. BurnettTexas Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Beaumont v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- Moore v. City of BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Imperial Production Corp. v. City of SweetwaterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- City of Arlington v. BardinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Vilbig v. Housing Authority of the City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.