Legal Opinion

White v. Oakley

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1966No. 6751PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SARTAIN, Judge.

The plaintiff, Virgil White, claiming the ownership of an undivided 101/110th interest in and to 19.92 acres of land in St. Tammany Parish instituted this action against twenty-four defendants, heirs of August Bennett, owners of the remaining undivided 9/110th interest, seeking a partition by licitation in accordance with the expressed provisions of LSA-CCP Article 4621 et seq. Seventeen of the defendants were personally served. The remaining seven defendants were absentees and were citecfc through a curator ad hoc appointed by the-court. Several of the resident defendants,,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fernandez v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. Armwood v. KennedySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  3. Demaret v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1852
  4. Girault v. FeuchtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  5. White v. BergstedtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mullins v. PageLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Cheramie v. St. PierreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API