Legal Opinion

Obecny v. Goetz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 18, 1907PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Kunigunda Goetz,, from an interlocutory' judgment' of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered .in the .office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 7th day. of March, 1905, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Kings County Special Terra.

1Opinion of the Court

JENKS, J.:

The action is partition and the appeal is by the defendant Goetz from the interlocutory judgment therein. In 1857 Annah Dehnert owned the premises in fee. Ill 1860 she executed her will, devising all of her estate absolutely to the husband, Peter Dehnert. In 1876 Annah died survived by her said husband and four children, of whom three were born after the execution of her said will. In 1877 the will was probated, and the testator’s husband, Peter, entered into possession of the premises and held them until. 1880, .when he conveyed them to Miller, who, in 1881, conveyed them to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cutting v. . CuttingNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. De Peyster v. ClendiningNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
  3. Ford v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Smith v. . RobertsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Bulkley v. DepeysterNew York Supreme Court · 1841

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of GaffkenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. In re the Estate of QuickNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  3. In re the Estate BrantNew York Surrogate's Court · 1923
  4. Anderson v. TelsrowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  5. In re the Estate of HolmesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API