Legal Opinion

Hall v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1969No. 3166PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMUEL, Judge.

This is a suit for workmen’s compensation. Plaintiffs are the employee, Mrs. Irma Tuggle Hall, who seeks recovery for total and permanent disability benefits, penalties and attorney’s fees under the act, and her husband, Leonard P. Hall, Jr., whose claim is limited to medical expenses incurred on his wife’s behalf. The sole defendant is the wife’s employer, Sears, Roebuck & Company, Inc. After trial there was judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiffs, dismissing the latters’ suit. Plaintiffs have appealed.

Plaintiff (we will use this designation with reference…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  2. Stockstill v. Sears-Roebuck & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Honeycutt v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Allen v. Travelers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dupre v. VidrineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Hall v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API