Legal Opinion

Ceja v. Mobile Products, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 15, 2025No. 3:24-cv-07767Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BEATRICE CEJA, et al., Case No. 24-cv-07767-LJC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. REMAND 10 MOBILE PRODUCTS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendant. 11 12 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand. ECF No. 21. Plaintiffs filed suit against 13 the City and County of San Francisco and the State of California in San Francisco Superior Court 14 in April 2021. They subsequently named Mobile Products, Incorporated as an additional 15 defendant. Mobile Products, Incorporated removed the case to federal court in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. David Singer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API