Legal Opinion

Crystal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 26, 1997No. 96-2277PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In Crystal v. State, 672 So.2d 632 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), we vacated the appellant’s seven and one-half year sentence and remanded for resentencing. Upon remand, the trial court imposed a sentence of ten years. We vacate the ten year sentence because it violates the appellant’s right to due process under North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969).

The only reason advanced by the trial court for the increased sentence was that the original sentence was “actually an insufficient sentence and not commensurate with the crime that was committed.” But the facts of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Crystal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Everett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Griffith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API