Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1984No. 18892PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

This is an appeal from a third degree felony conviction of theft. 1 Defendant assigns the following as error: (1) insufficiency of the evidence; (2) denial of his motion to waive a jury trial; (3) admission of improper evidence during the State’s rebuttal argument; and (4) inclusion of a partial written deposition in the evidence which the jury was permitted to take with them into their place of deliberation.

In 1978, Joseph Mascaro and Charley Joseph became investment partners for the purpose of purchasing options on two adjacent parcels of real property located in Utah…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Proctor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. State v. HoferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  4. Shedden v. StilesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. RobbinsUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Shoreline Development, Inc. v. Utah CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  4. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  5. State v. DavisUtah Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API