Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rakes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1990No. 00218PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This appeal is from a judgment of sentence for statutory rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, and corruption of a minor. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in (1) allowing the Commonwealth to introduce into evidence a letter written by the victim’s mother; and (2) admitting the hearsay testimony of two witnesses. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

On March 28, 1987, appellant was arrested and charged with one count each of statutory rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, indecent assault, and corruption of a minor. The charges were based on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. GraysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. BonacursoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. ContakosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. HaberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BurkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. SullivanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Bullman v. GiuntoliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. LongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. BoringSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API