Legal Opinion

Miller v. Ruse

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1913No. 7,869PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Superior Court of Marion County (78,929); John J. Rockford, Special Judge. Action by Joseph M. Miller and another against Asa 0. Ruse and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

Appellants in their brief, under the head, “Nature of the Action” say: “This was an action brought by appellants against appellee for an injunction seeking to enjoin the maintenance of a nuisance.” Then follows a statement of the facts showing the nature of the action, after which, under the head of “The Issues” it is stated that the complaint consisted of two paragraphs. The first paragraph alleged the ownership in the appellants of the land abutting upon said public alleys and the maintaining of a nuisance and prayed for an abatement of the same. The second paragraph was dismissed upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago, Indiana & Eastern Railway Co. v. Wysor Land Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Albaugh Bros., Dover & Co. v. LynasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Schrader v. MeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Thieme & Wagner Brewing Co. v. KesslerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Anderson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brayton v. City of RushvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Newman v. HornerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Doehring v. HollenbeckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Galvin v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API